Adjunct Whore’s idea of failing her more disagreeable students is pleasant to contemplate but also naive in the extreme. At my university, the writing program (not to be confused with the MFA program) is effectively a separate entity from the English Department, with its own rules and Catches-22. Instructors in composition are required by partially unstated policy to grade on a rightward-shifted bell curve, with the “sweet spot” hitting at about B+. So, out of a class of 23 students, 12 should get a B+, 8 should get an A- or C, and three should get an A or D. Generally speaking, D’s are highly discouraged, so generally one awards three A’s.

Failing students might also be seen as indicative of the program’s failure to educate, also landing the program under the microscope of the Chancellor. So, failing students is considered to be a failure of the instructor to teach; failing more than one student over the course of one’s employment – and then only for assault – will result in the instructor’s being blackballed from teaching while he or she is connected to the university.
To add to this, Adjunct Whore’s idea of imposing Nabokovian quizzes is impossible; students cannot be graded on assignments that have not been set out by the course director.
Otherwise, I would love to give my students the grades they deserve – not out of sadism, but out of respect for the verities of their performance.
To add to this, Adjunct Whore’s idea of imposing Nabokovian quizzes is impossible; students cannot be graded on assignments that have not been set out by the course director.
Otherwise, I would love to give my students the grades they deserve – not out of sadism, but out of respect for the verities of their performance.