Monday, October 29, 2007

"Uh, Are They All Supposed to Be Green?" Something Else To Worry About.

I teach at a small public university in a physical sciences department.

A student of mine was found to be in possession of a cheat-sheet in the sophomore level class. She was issued a grade of F for the course, as explicitly outlined in my syllabus. In the grievance process, the faculty upheld my decision to assign an F to the student. But, she continued her grievance to the Provost's office, and was allowed to retake the examination in question, and her grade was re-calculated.

Bear in mind, gentle readers, that she was interning out of state during the summer when the situation had to be rectified, and at the expense of the university she was flown in to re-take that examination. In the end she still failed the exam, which lowered her overall grade to a C, instead of the prescribed F for her earlier transgression during the spring semester. Where is she now, you ask? She is mid-way through her graduate pharmacy studies.

It is quite clear that the policies of our department, the ones put in place to maintain a standard of ethical behavior, are incogruous with those of the university administration as a whole. It is also quite clear that those who are establishing rules which our little darlings should strive to follow in their professional lives, don't give a fuck about whether someone who can't calculate a pharmaceutical formulation properly will actually go out and make such formulations.

Customers at pharmacies across this glorious nation of cheaters and plagiarizers beware...there is a slack-ass dipshit about to push your pills to you.

About RYS:

Rate Your Students (RYS) is an academic blog moderated by a rotating group of college professors. To submit work for possible inclusion on the RYS blog, please submit text to our main mailing address.

Generally, stand alone pieces that are "lively" and focused on the terrifying life of a college proffie have the highest chance of making the page. Responses to earlier posts work well only when they come in within 24 hours of the original post. Otherwise the issue has often cooled.

There will usually be 2 site-wide questions each week, the so called "early thirsty" on Tuesday and the "big thirsty" on - well, Thursday. Generally, short and savage replies work best as we normally bundle a variety of responses in bullet format.

Due to the amount of mail we receive, it is impossible to reply to writers, even those whose work we use. This is a failing we would change if we could. Generally, if your post doesn't appear within the first week of you sending it, we've passed on it.

We also are happy to consider links and videos you think our readers might be interested in. We post links on an irregular schedule, but are currently posting 4-5 videos a week given the number of suggested pieces that come in.

We no longer entertain requests for press of any kind. The names of current and past moderators are not available. If you don't like the VidShizzles, please don't watch them. If you don't like the site, please don't read it. If you think we're clueless morons who've ruined the profession, then join the fucking club.